Parallels in Activism
Instructor Resources
- On this Page
- Overview
- Presentation Files
- Lesson 1
- Lesson 2
- Module Developers
Overview
Parallels Among Public Interest Communication, Cause Communication, and Activism
This module explores the dynamic relationship between public relations, activism, and the public good. Students will examine how communication strategies shape causes, influence public interest, and support ethical advocacy. Through discussion, case studies, and creative projects, the module encourages reflection on personal and professional roles as advocates and civic professionals. By connecting theory to real-world examples, students will gain a deeper understanding of how public relations can be a force for positive social change and responsible engagement in the public sphere.
Presentation Files
Lesson 1: Activism, Advocacy and Others
The first lesson will examine the parallels among public interest communication, cause communication, and activism. The primary lesson will introduce these three concepts through definitions and examples to better ground student understanding.
The lesson will explain these concepts by detailing the differences and similarities among the ideas. The lesson will also speak to how the they relate to public relations and the Page Principles.
This lesson will end with a discussion of three adjacent areas – advocacy, corporate social advocacy and public interest relations. Again, each area will be defined, and we will provide examples of each. Next, the differences and similarities will be detailed. The lesson will explain how each additional concept relates to both public relations and the Page Principles.
Finally, the lesson ends with best practices guided by the Page Principles.
Key Concepts
Activism, cause-related marketing, public interest communication, advocacy, corporate social advocacy, and public interest relations.
Discussion Starters
Start by asking students to think about the following:
Case study
The case study about Stacy Abrams and Fair Fight Action helps students to better understand activism. After reviewing the case materials, lead a classroom debate if Fair Fight is cause communication, activism, public interest communication, or a combination.
If the classroom allows, have the students go to different corners of the room for each category. In those groups, have the student discuss why they picked that term.
Next, have the groups share their reasoning with the class. As the groups share, encourage students to move among corners of the room based on their current belief.
To conclude the assignment, discuss the differences and overlap of these concepts. Also, address why one category may have "won."
Conclusion
After completing Lesson 1, students will be able to explain the concepts of public interest communication, cause communication, activism, advocacy, corporate social advocacy, and public interest relations. Students will also be able to differentiate among these concepts and demonstrate connections to public relations and explain best and ethical practices for each.
Suggested in-class or at-home activities:
Lesson 2: Professionalism, Civic Professionalism, Public Good, Public Interest and Youth Activism
The second lesson will focus on the public interest and public good. These concepts will be defined and history examined. The lesson will also speak to William Sullivan's idea of civic professionalism and explain how this concept affects public relations practice. To complete this lesson, we will delve into Generation Z and its interest in activism, the public interest, cause communication, and the public good. Finally, public relations elements within youth-driven activism examples will be described.
Key Concepts
Professionalism, civic professionalism, public good, public interest, and youth activism.
Discussion Starters
Start by asking students to think about the following:
Case study
The second case study looks at how youth activism has been used to diversify school reading lists.
After reviewing the case materials, you can have students take their turn practicing youth activism through The Public Square activity.
In this activity, students will list issues they have strong convictions about and then explore where and how they would present these issues.
Individually have students select issues about which they feel strongly. Encourage students to think of a wide variety of topics—not all subjects have to be hot-button political issues. For example, if they love dogs and think everyone should rescue one, that is a great topic. Having some lighter issues can help with this activity.
After the students have their topics, place the students in small groups to share their lists. Students can talk about why the issues are important and their positions.
Next, introduce the concept of the public square as a common space where people can voice their opinions. Many universities have a public square or commons where students and organizations can voice their opinions. If your university does not have a formal public square, ask students where they could have a public speech or demonstration on campus. A history of public squares, although a violent one, can be found from the BBC at https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20141203-blood-on-the-streets.
End by having the students consider if they would talk about the issue on campus, at a family gathering, on a date, in their hometown, at their statehouse, and at the U.S. capital and why. Also, have the students expand on how they would change the presentation of the issue with each different setting.
Additionally, the students can discuss if the internet and social media expand or limit the concept of a public square.
Conclusion
After completing the lesson, students will be able to describe what the public interest is and discuss what the public good is. Students will also be able to explain professionalism and demonstrate what it means to be a civic professional. In addition, they will be able to summarize Generation Z's interest in the public interest and public good and name public relations elements within youth-driven activism examples.
Suggested in-class or at-home activities:
Module Developers
Dr. Brigitta R. Brunner
Professor, Auburn University
Brigitta R. Brunner is a professor at and endowed alumni professor at the Auburn University School of Communication & Journalism. She has been on faculty at AU since 2002 teaching PR classes at the undergraduate and graduate levels. She served as the inaugural editor of the Journal of Public Interest Communications.
Her research interests include the public interest, public relations, and education. She has published four edited and co-authored books. The Moral Compass of Public Relations was awarded a 2017 PRIDE Book Award by the Public Relations Division of NCA. Cases in Public Relations: Translating Ethics into Action, co-authored with Corey A. Hickerson, was awarded a 2019 PRIDE Book Award by the Public Relations Division of NCA. Brunner also has numerous published articles in journals such as Public Relations Inquiry, Public Relations Review, Journal of Public Relations Education, and Journal of Public Relations Research.
Dr. Corey A. Hickerson
Professor, James Madison University
Corey Hickerson, Ph.D., is the graduate director of the JMU Communication and Advocacy master’s degree program and teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in strategic communication and public relations. His research interests include communication pedagogy, privacy, stakeholder engagement, and technology.
Hickerson and Brigitta Brunner’s book, Cases in Public Relations: Translating Ethics into Action, won the National Communication Association Public Relations Division's PRIDE Book of the Year Award. He also has won the JMU Carl Harter Distinguished Professor, the Center for Instructional Technology’s Learning with Technology award, and the Provost’s Award for Excellence in Graduate Advising.